Mandato / Compare / Sudespacho

Mandato vs Sudespacho: an honest comparison (2026)

Similar price, different decade. What separates these two products isn't what they cost, but when they were conceived.

Sudespacho has been in small and mid-sized Spanish firms for a long time, and that doesn't happen by accident. Its support is genuinely close: you call and someone who knows your firm answers, not a ticket queue. It understands the reality of the three-person firm in a provincial capital better than most new products, because it has spent years sitting with one. If the human relationship and the continuity are what tie you to a supplier, that is a legitimate reason to stay, and we are not going to treat it as nostalgia.

What we will say plainly is that a product conceived a decade ago shows it in daily use, and that at a comparable price you can have a tool designed for how firms work now: in two languages, with AI inside the workflow, and with invoicing welded to the matter. Where we have no verified public information about Sudespacho, the cell says so rather than implying a gap.

CapabilityMandatoSudespacho
Close, direct supportemail and chat, no named manager
Filing written submissions via LexNET
Long track record in Spanish firms
LexNET notifications received into the matter
AI embedded in every workflowno verified public information
Bilingual ES/EN across UI, portal and templatesno verified public information
Invoicing from the matterchained records and QR as standardno verified public information
Bilingual client portalno verified public information
WhatsApp Business as a channel of the matterno verified public information
Catastro and BOE/BORME lookups; registry trackingno verified public information

Swipe the table to see more →

included partial not available

The decade between the two products

Software resembles the moment it was conceived. Products designed early last decade take for granted things that now grate: that the client telephones to ask how their matter is going, that documents travel as email attachments, that the phone is a secondary screen, that English is an exception.

Mandato was built inside a firm serving clients of more than twenty nationalities, and that premise changes the whole product. The client portal exists because clients would rather not call. WhatsApp is a channel of the matter because that is where the client already is. Templates exist written in Spanish and in English because nobody signs a machine-translated deposit contract.

None of this makes Sudespacho a bad product. It makes it a product of another era, which does well what that era asked for.

Support, which is their strongest argument

Let's be blunt: on support, Sudespacho wins. A small firm that has built a relationship with its supplier over years holds something a pricing page cannot buy. When something breaks on a Friday afternoon, knowing who to call is worth money.

Mandato answers by email and chat, with no named account manager, and answers quickly. It is not the same thing, and claiming it is would be exactly the sort of statement this page exists to avoid. If that is your main criterion, stay where you are.

What changes at a similar price

At a comparable per-user cost, the difference plays out in the admin that disappears. LexNET notifications land in the matter with the deadline already calculated in the calendar. The Catastro is queried from the matter, the nota simple and certificates are read on arrival, and BOE/BORME alerts arrive unasked. Invoicing is born in the matter with chained records and a QR as standard, and exports to Holded if the books live there.

And on what used to be an asymmetry — filing written submissions through LexNET — Mandato is now on par: it receives the notifications, calculates the deadlines and files the submissions from the matter itself. For a litigation practice, that closes the one gap that remained against Sudespacho.

Choose Sudespacho if…

Close support and the relationship with your supplier are what you value most, and your firm works in Spanish with Spanish clients.

Choose Mandato if…

You serve clients in English, you want a portal where the client looks instead of calling, you want invoicing welded to the matter and AI in every workflow.

We import your matters — no pain, no Excel in between.

Clients, matters and documents migrate as part of onboarding, at no extra cost.

Try Mandato free